🔗 Share this article

Some battle royale enthusiasts are feeling let down, and it's not due to recent virtual events. The game's current limited-time event, that introduces a Springfield map, has also rolled out a fresh mechanic called pets. There's no ignore that these new companions are cute. However, the associated prices have left many fans stunned at this developer's efforts to monetize nearly every part of the game.

Understanding Sidekicks?

Sidekicks are basically similar to digital creatures, but having a few drawbacks. You can name them, and they will follow you during a game. They are immortal, and players can interact with them. Opposing gamers outside the player's squad are unable to view these pets — and displaying your companions is perhaps a big part of the enjoyment of having them. Pets can be outfitted with costumes and gestures, but the controversy centers on their appearance. A sidekick's overall appearance is only able to be changed once, after which that choice becomes permanent. Players can choose a sidekick's fur shade, accent hues, iris tones, markings, and its body type.

The Costly Personalization System

Should you afterward choose that they'd like their pet to look slightly different, it's not possible to just further modify its look. You have to purchase another sidekick. Furthermore, sidekicks aren't cheap. Most players are getting the banana-themed pet, because it is packaged in the current battle pass. Based on leaks, upcoming sidekicks may cost from 1,000 to 1,500 V-Bucks; to put that in perspective, 1,000 V-Bucks costs $8.99 and 2,800 V-Bucks are $22.99. However, players can change the name of a sidekick whenever they want.

Player Reaction and Comparisons

The majority of pets haven't been officially launched so far, so the cost may well be adjusted. Yet even if the developer sets sidekicks cheaper, a lot of the anger comes from the reality that gamers might need to pay for a one kind of pet multiple times. For some, the cost structure seems especially egregious considering the game has previously added pets that ride about as part of back blings. Backpack companions lack a restriction on changes and can be seen by other participants in the match. Backpack buddies cannot be given a name or use gestures, but opposing players can occasionally engage with them — which is more favorable than being invisible altogether.

The absence of unique functions and limited engagement options have numerous players experiencing disappointed. For instance, why is it not possible to a player, for example, interact playfully with their fancy fruit-themed pet? A few note that companions sometimes fail to stay close with the player if a match is fast-paced, or mention that the banana pet occupies two spots in the reward system — which reinforces the notion that the developer is squeezing players for money. Greedy is a word that's coming up frequently in these discussions, with some comparing sidekick monetization to other aggressive monetization models in games like popular sports games. It also adds to the issue that certain sidekicks are projected to be pricier than their outfit versions.

"PLEASE do not purchasing Sidekicks," pleads a popular community post that advises fellow players to proverbially express disapproval by not spending.

"We understand they're adorable," the thread continues, "I know they are enjoyable. I know everyone has been looking forward to them. But the monetization focus on display is unacceptable and should not be rewarded."

The Broader Context of In-Game Purchases

In recent years, the game's special occasions and collaborations have expanded in scope and aspiration, yet the no-cost-to-start title continues to must generate income. Therefore, the sheer number of cosmetics users can now purchase has become almost overwhelming. In addition to standard items like back accessories, deployment tools, harvesting tools, and emotes, you could possibly spend money on footwear, music tracks, instruments, Lego pieces, cars, tires, vehicle drift colors, battle passes, and a membership. Companion pets do not just cost payment, but also introduce a host of fresh monetization options for the developer. It is likely, users will before long be in a position to pay for things like sidekick looks, outfits, emotes, and additional interaction options.

All of such customization items are entirely optional and not necessary to have fun with the game, yet equipment can nonetheless influence a player's social interactions. Kids, for example, at times face bullying for not wearing flashy enough skins. A comparable issue previously occurred when the developer introduced licensed shoes, which may be priced from 600 to 1,000 V-Bucks. The footwear cost model was not popular as well, and some fans promised that they'd avoid fall prey to the pressure back then. But in the end, purchasing shoes became normalized. Today, companion pets are further testing the limits of how much a player could be willing to pay to be distinctive within the player base.

What's Next for Sidekicks?

Pets are still a fairly recent addition, and they exist a game that updates regularly. Some players are sharing that they have received a survey that gauges how the community feel about sidekick mechanics and monetization, and this might potentially indicate that the developer's plans are still fluid. But if Fortnite footwear are any indication, sidekicks likely won't get more affordable overall — there will just be a broader selection of costs to choose from.

Ultimately, while certain individuals are expressing anger at Fortnite item costs, others are experiencing only joy for their new battle royale pals.